No, it’s not a new development. It has been the policy, at least on paper, of the Mount Vernon Board of Education to allow the teaching of controversial issues.
The following is the board’s “Controversial Issues” policy followed by the administrative guidelines for “Controversial Issues in the Classroom”:
Policy 2240 - Controversial Issues
The Board of Education believes that the consideration of controversial issues has a legitimate place in the instructional program of the schools.
Properly introduced and conducted, the consideration of such issues can help students learn to identify important issues, explore fully and fairly all sides of an issue, weigh carefully the values and factors involved, and develop techniques for formulating and evaluating positions.
For purposes of this policy, a controversial issue is a topic on which opposing points of view have been promulgated by responsible opinion.
The Board will permit the introduction and proper educational
use of controversial issues provided that their use in the instructional
program:
A. is related to the
instructional goals of the course of study and level of maturity of the
students;
B. does not tend to
indoctrinate or persuade students to a particular point of view;
C. encourages
open-mindedness and is conducted in a spirit of scholarly inquiry.
Controversial issues may not be initiated by a source
outside the schools unless prior approval has been given by the principal.
When controversial issues have not been specified in the
course of study, the Board will permit the instructional use of only those
issues which have been approved by the principal.
No classroom teacher shall be prohibited from providing
reasonable periods of time for activities of a moral, philosophical, or
patriotic theme. No student shall be required to participate in such activities
if they are contrary to the religious convictions of the student or his/her
parents or guardians.
The Board also recognizes that a course of study or certain
instructional materials may contain content and/or activities that some parents
find objectionable. If after careful, personal review of the program lessons
and/or materials, a parent indicates to the school that either the content or
activities conflicts with his/her religious beliefs or value system, the school
will honor a written request for his/her child to be excused from a particular
class for specified reasons. The student, however, will not be excused from
participating in the course and will be provided alternate learning activities
during times of such parent requested absences.
R.C. 3313.601
Revised 1/6/03
Controversial Issues in the Classroom
The following guidelines are designed to assist teachers in
the instruction of controversial issues in the classroom, as defined in Policy
2240.
A. When a
controversial issue is not part of an approved course of study, its use must be
approved by the Principal.
B. Before
introducing a controversial issue, teachers should consider:
1. the
chronological and emotional maturity of the students;
2. the
appropriateness and timeliness of the issue as it relates to the course and the
students;
3. the extent to
which they can successfully handle the issue from a personal standpoint;
4. the amount of
time needed and available to examine the issue fairly.
C. When discussing a
controversial issue, the teacher may express his/her own personal position as
long as s/he makes it clear that it is only his/her opinion. The teacher must
not, however, bring about a single conclusion to which all students must
subscribe.
D. The teacher
should encourage student views on issues as long as the expression of those
views is not derogatory, malicious, or abusive toward other student views or
toward a particular group.
E. Teachers should
help students use a critical thinking process such as the following to examine
different sides of an issue:
For each stated
position:
1. What is the
person (group) saying?
2. What evidence
is there that what is being said is true?
3. What is said
that would lead you to think the position is valid?
4. What are the
strengths and weaknesses of this position?
5. What do you
think would happen if this point of view was accepted and was put into
practice?
For reaching
conclusions:
1. On balance,
what do you think is the most reasoned statement? the most valid position?
2. What is there
in the statements that supports your conclusion? What other things, beside what
is being said, leads you to your conclusion?
See here for a PDF compilation of the “Bylaws & Policies
and Administrative Guidelines” adopted by the school board.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments from all ideological viewpoints are welcome. However, please avoid abusive language and ad hominem attacks.